Were The Gunpowder Plotters Framed? Cecil hated the Catholics and wanted to show them to be against the country. �U ����^�s������1xRp����b�D#rʃ�Y���Nʬr��ɗJ�C.a�eD��=�U]���S����ik�@��X6�G[:b4�(uH����%��-���+0A?�t>vT��������9�. Also source five suggests the plot was organised by someone outside the government, but source six suggests it could only have been someone with a great amount of power, someone such as a member of parliament. An evidence based card-sort on the Gunpowder Plot for students to create their own theories on how far the government was involved. Why, when they knew they were discovered, did the plotters not run away? All of the conspirators were executed except one – Francis Tresham. Source five is a letter received by Lord Mounteagle on the only night he was at his London house in 1605 this suggests that it must have been somebody close to Lord Mounteagle to know the day he was at his London home and to want to warn him about the plot. All rights reserved. A few examples of this suggestion are: “Foul play” and “The government secretly spun a web” also “entangle these poor gentlemen. How to cite Was Guy Fawkes Framed? — -o- — Some say the gunpowder plotter was framed – and that he was the victim of one of the biggest conspiracies in history. Find out more. Source three says that he was going to blow the houses of parliament up later in the meeting, after the king had arrived, this could be taken that the King planned this to make it look like the plotters were against the King. The work on this site may be copied and/or adapted for use in the classroom or for private study. ���?��{X�`��L�\at�L�W$VOYt����J�̋��:���m�>�ܨ�q�����V�T ��/t�UKo]GL��=~&�?�bߠ*v^�QX����dѭp�S�T-��u�O�P�~�T3��2��sJW����2΅�/E����e�Šm�J��bZӄ�؇�$H'�!8��s�_:'8��k'���:c}��Ļ� OA6�w ������T�٩(��RA�}��wQ��}#�f�k?^-�7a�ܪ}�)�O���(S�n��˛1�q�fLa��S���y��B^pq�L��!Bu��4��G:M��o���VD�,}��C ���n��(Ҩ������L�AV���z� �� PK ! Scott Michael Rank, Ph.D., is the editor of History on the Net and host of the History Unplugged podcast. Can we trust the evidence? Magna Carta resources from the British Library, Germany 1890-1945: Democracy and dictatorship, Power and conflict in the Early Modern Period. Source one suggests that the government were behind the plot, this can be seen from, “Foul play” and “government secretly spun a web. Copyright Sandbox Learning Limited. It would have been almost impossible for them to get hold of 36 barrels of gunpowder without the government finding out. ” This paragraph makes the reader believe that the government planned the plot to make Catholics look bad. However this could also be seen that the king had to get the truth out of Guy because he did not know. Source three disagrees with the “Guy Fawkes’ and the Catholics were framed” theory because it is a confession that he did do it. California – Do not sell my personal information. The Official Story. The plotters. All rights reserved. He had only recently returned to England maybe specifically to set the explosives. Source one has lots of information suggesting that the Gunpowder plot was planned to frame the Catholics. Francis Tresham was only thinking of his brother-in-law’s safety when he sent the letter. Gunpowder was not normally kept in the cellars under the Houses of Parliament. Find out more. Also the gunpowder used was stored in the cellar next to the houses of parliament, but this cellar was rented by John Whynniard, a kings official and friend of Cecil. The group rented a cellar beneath the Houses of Parliament and stored 20 barrels of gunpowder, supplied by Guido Fawkes. England at the time was a kingdom fraught with tension between the ruling Protestants and Catholics like Fawkes. So when the plot led to tough laws making it treason to obey the Pope over the King, some smelt a stitch-up. essay or were the "conspirators" framed by the King's men? However this could also be seen that he was in too much pain to write properly. The King was forced to believe that the Catholics wanted to ‘blow up the Houses of Parliament and blow him back to Scotland, and to his Catholic Mother’. There is evidence to support this view: This picture showing the conspirators, was made by a Dutchman who had never seen the conspirators. Only Francis Tresham was left free all the others were killed or captured quickly but he was left free until December 12th when he was taken to the Tower and died of a mysterious illness on December 23rd. Magna Carta resources from the British Library, Germany 1890-1945: Democracy and dictatorship, Power and conflict in the Early Modern Period. Click here for our comprehensive article on the Stuarts. From source one you can infer that this particular catholic believes that the government planned this to frame Catholics. In some places, children make an effigy called a Guy, which is burned on the bonfire. This source cannot be completely trustworthy because the author of it is Catholic so he could be being more favourable to the Catholics side. A small group of Catholics, Robert Catesby, Guido (Guy) Fawkes, Thomas Winter, John Wright and Thomas Percy decided to blow up the King on the State opening of Parliament. All rights reserved. The plot was used as Protestant propaganda to attack the Catholics and prove that God was on the side of the Protestants. This could indicate that Whynniard was involved he was someone with a great deal of power, so it could have been organised by him. “Remember, remember, the fifth of November” Do we recall a myth or reality? There was no doubt an attempt to blow up Parliament on November 5th 1605. Many historians today agree with the Catholics of the time that the Gunpowder Plot conspirators were framed by James I’s chief minister, Robert Cecil. An evidence based card-sort on the Gunpowder Plot for students to create their own theories on how far the government was involved. Guido (Guy) Fawkes was an explosives expert who had served with the Spanish army in the Netherlands. Theres no doubtfulness ab step up it that there was a plot to blow parliament up in 1604, only was Guy Fawkes re consort the sense to blame? i have to write a history essay on whether the gunpowder plotters were framed and have found a lot of evidence to prove they were framed but can't find anything to say they weren't Update : To Josh, what evidence is there though that the plot was genuine. However, Source one suggests the government were behind the plot but source five suggests that the plot was organised by someone who has no power or is not an official.